How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HY300 PRO+ vs NeoPix 100

Magcubic HY300 PRO+ vs Philips NeoPix 100

What HY300 PRO+ does better (4) and where NeoPix 100 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Magcubic HY300 PRO+
Magcubic · 2024HY300 PRO+
4.1Score
4 advantages≈ US$65
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 100
Philips · 2024NeoPix 100
0 advantages≈ US$85

Why is HY300 PRO+ better than NeoPix 100?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 6 W+67%
  3. Native panel resolution1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  4. Largest image size130″ vs 65″2×

Why is NeoPix 100 better than HY300 PRO+?

NeoPix 100 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1024 × 768 (XGA)854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution1024 × 768 (XGA)854 × 480 (480p)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:11.47:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m3.25 m
Largest image size130″65″
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W6 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life10,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB—
Weight—0.8 kg
Width—158 mm
Height—205 mm
Depth—78 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare