- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HY350 vs NeoPix 140
Magcubic HY350 vs Philips NeoPix 140
What HY350 does better (3) and where NeoPix 140 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.9Picture2.4
4.4Setup & placement2.1
Why is HY350 better than NeoPix 140?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:1 vs 1,000:120×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
Why is NeoPix 140 better than HY350?
- Wi-FiNo · HY350: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 20,000:1 | 1,000:1 |
| HDR support | No | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | — | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.3 kg |
| Width | — | 68 mm |
| Height | — | 142 mm |
| Depth | — | 74 mm |
| Colours | Grey | — |
