How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs HY350

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD vs Magcubic HY350

What Luma 400 tragbarer HD does better (1) and where HY350 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
1 advantage
vs
Magcubic HY350
Magcubic · 2026HY350
4.5Score
3 advantages≈ US$130
Higher score
3.0Picture3.9

Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than HY350?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 150 lm+33%

Why is HY350 better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:1 vs 20,000:15.7×
  3. Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications

Side by side

Magcubic HY350Magcubic HY350≈ US$1304.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm150 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500:120,000:1
HDR support—No
Lens & placement
Lens shift—None
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-Fi—No
Bluetooth—Yes
AirPlay—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs1—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputNo—
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life3,500 h—
Design & noise
ColoursBlack, WhiteGrey
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare