How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HY350 vs TX-332

Magcubic HY350 vs Technaxx TX-332

What HY350 does better (1) and where TX-332 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Magcubic HY350
Magcubic · 2026HY350
4.5Score
1 advantage≈ US$130
Higher score
vs
Technaxx TX-332
Technaxx · 2025TX-332
4.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$140
3.9Picture4.0
4.4Setup & placement5.5
2.6Smart features & sound2.1

Why is HY350 better than TX-332?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:1 vs 1,000:120×

Why is TX-332 better than HY350?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 200 lm+33%
  2. Wi-FiNo · HY350: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Magcubic HY350Magcubic HY350≈ US$1304.5
Technaxx TX-332Technaxx TX-332≈ US$1404.3
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:11,000:1
HDR supportNo—
Lens & placement
Smallest image size—27″
Largest image size—150″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—3 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiNoYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlayYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs—1
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—0.8 kg
ColoursGreyWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare