How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. L018 vs NeoPix 106

Magcubic L018 vs Philips NeoPix 106

What L018 does better (2) and where NeoPix 106 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Magcubic L018
Magcubic · 2025L018
2 advantages≈ US$110
vs
Philips NeoPix 106
Philips · 2026NeoPix 106
4.0Score
2 advantages≈ US$110
Higher score
7.1Setup & placement5.8

Why is L018 better than NeoPix 106?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:1 vs 500:140×
  2. Largest image size300″ vs 50″6×

Why is NeoPix 106 better than L018?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · L018: Yes
  2. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Magcubic L018Magcubic L018≈ US$110
Philips NeoPix 106Philips NeoPix 106≈ US$1104.0
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—60 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)650 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:1500:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size40″—
Largest image size300″50″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—2 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs—1
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—0.51 kg
Width—158 mm
Height—73 mm
Depth—121 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare