How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. L018 vs TX-332

Magcubic L018 vs Technaxx TX-332

What L018 does better (2) and where TX-332 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Magcubic L018
Magcubic · 2025L018
2 advantages≈ US$110
vs
Technaxx TX-332
Technaxx · 2025TX-332
4.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$140
Higher score
7.1Setup & placement5.5

Why is L018 better than TX-332?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:1 vs 1,000:120×
  2. Largest image size300″ vs 150″2×

Why is TX-332 better than L018?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Magcubic L018Magcubic L018≈ US$110
Technaxx TX-332Technaxx TX-332≈ US$1404.3
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—200 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)650 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)20,000:11,000:1
Lens & placement
Smallest image size40″27″
Largest image size300″150″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—3 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlay—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs—1
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight—0.8 kg
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare