How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Astro vs NeoPix 122

Nebula Astro vs Philips NeoPix 122

What Astro does better (1) and where NeoPix 122 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Nebula Astro
Nebula · 2020Astro
1 advantage≈ US$230
vs
Philips NeoPix 122
Philips · 2024NeoPix 122
4.8Score
0 advantages≈ US$230
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

AstroNeoPix 122
89 × 9182225 × 102190
AstroNeoPix 122Difference
Height91 mm102 mm−11 mm
Width89 mm225 mm−136 mm
Depth82 mm190 mm−108 mm
Weight0.4 kg0.8 kg−0.5 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Astro better than NeoPix 122?

  1. Weight0.38 kg vs 0.85 kg2.2×

Why is NeoPix 122 better than Astro?

NeoPix 122 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Nebula AstroNebula Astro≈ US$230
Philips NeoPix 122Philips NeoPix 122≈ US$2304.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution—1280 × 720 (HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLED—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm100 lm
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.39:11.47:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.08 m3.25 m
Smallest image size—65″
Largest image size—65″
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYes—
Power consumption—42 W
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB—
Weight0.38 kg0.85 kg
Width89 mm225 mm
Height91 mm102 mm
Depth82 mm190 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare