How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TV340031 vs NeoPix 100

NK TV340031 vs Philips NeoPix 100

What TV340031 does better (3) and where NeoPix 100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

NK TV340031
NK · 2025TV340031
3.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$75
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 100
Philips · 2024NeoPix 100
2 advantages≈ US$85
Dimensions

Size comparison

TV340031NeoPix 100
93 × 93190158 × 20578
TV340031NeoPix 100Difference
Height93 mm205 mm−112 mm
Width93 mm158 mm−65 mm
Depth190 mm78 mm+112 mm
Weight0.6 kg0.8 kg−0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TV340031 better than NeoPix 100?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  2. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  3. Weight0.61 kg vs 0.8 kg+31%

Why is NeoPix 100 better than TV340031?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)3 W vs 6 W2×
  2. Audio outputNo · TV340031: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

NK TV340031NK TV340031≈ US$753.9
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)120 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.47:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.25 m
Largest image size—65″
Autofocus—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W6 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputNoYes
Design & noise
Weight0.61 kg0.8 kg
Width93 mm158 mm
Height93 mm205 mm
Depth190 mm78 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare