- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TV340031 vs NeoPix 140
NK TV340031 vs Philips NeoPix 140
What TV340031 does better (2) and where NeoPix 140 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.4Picture2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
TV340031NeoPix 140
| TV340031 | NeoPix 140 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 93 mm | 142 mm | −49 mm |
| Width | 93 mm | 68 mm | +25 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 74 mm | +116 mm |
| Weight | 0.6 kg | 0.3 kg | +0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TV340031 better than NeoPix 140?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
Why is NeoPix 140 better than TV340031?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)120 lm vs 150 lm+25%
- Weight0.61 kg vs 0.3 kg2×
- Audio outputNo · TV340031: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 120 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | — | 65″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.61 kg | 0.3 kg |
| Width | 93 mm | 68 mm |
| Height | 93 mm | 142 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 74 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
