How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HD146X vs NeoPix Prime 2

Optoma HD146X vs Philips NeoPix Prime 2

What HD146X does better (5) and where NeoPix Prime 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Optoma HD146X
Optoma · 2020HD146X
5.5Score
5 advantages≈ US$650
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix Prime 2
Philips · 2021NeoPix Prime 2
2 advantages
4.2Picture2.2

Why is HD146X better than NeoPix Prime 2?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,600 lm vs 180 lm20×
  2. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)25,000:1 vs 3,000:18.3×
  4. Largest image size300″ vs 80″3.8×
  5. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)

Why is NeoPix Prime 2 better than HD146X?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)3 W vs 10 W3.3×
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

Optoma HD146XOptoma HD146X≈ US$6505.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,600 lm180 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)25,000:13,000:1
HDR supportNo—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:11.3:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.62:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m2.88 m
Smallest image size28″—
Largest image size300″80″
Optical zoom2×—
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption295 W—
Light source life4,000 h—
Light source life (eco mode)10,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise26 dB—
Weight—3 kg
ColoursBlackSilver, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare