How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HZ146X-W vs NeoPix 750

Optoma HZ146X-W vs Philips NeoPix 750

What HZ146X-W does better (3) and where NeoPix 750 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Optoma HZ146X-W
Optoma · 2023HZ146X-W
7.1Score
3 advantages≈ US$610
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
0 advantages≈ US$610
Dimensions

Size comparison

HZ146X-WNeoPix 750
274 × 114216305 × 119319
HZ146X-WNeoPix 750Difference
Height114 mm119 mm−5 mm
Width274 mm305 mm−31 mm
Depth216 mm319 mm−103 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HZ146X-W better than NeoPix 750?

  1. Largest image size300″ vs 120″2.5×
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  3. Built-in speakers (total output)15 W vs 14 W+7%

Why is NeoPix 750 better than HZ146X-W?

NeoPix 750 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Optoma HZ146X-WOptoma HZ146X-W≈ US$6107.1
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLaser—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,800 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)2,000,000:1—
HDR supportNo—
3D playbackYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.48:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.62:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.28 m—
Smallest image size20″—
Largest image size300″120″
Optical zoom1.1×—
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)15 W14 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
HDMI version2—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise32 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)27 dB—
Weight4.2 kg—
Width274 mm305 mm
Height114 mm119 mm
Depth216 mm319 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare