How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Photon Life PH31 vs K2s Pro

Optoma Photon Life PH31 vs Yaber K2s Pro

What Photon Life PH31 does better (2) and where K2s Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Optoma Photon Life PH31
Optoma · 2025Photon Life PH31
3.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$390
vs
Yaber K2s Pro
Yaber · 2025K2s Pro
4.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$380
Higher score
3.1Picture3.3
2.1Setup & placement2.8

Why is Photon Life PH31 better than K2s Pro?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,500 lm vs 1,000 lm+50%
  2. Weight2.2 kg vs 3.2 kg+45%

Why is K2s Pro better than Photon Life PH31?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 20 W4×
  2. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)400:1 vs 15,000:137.5×
  3. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  4. Largest image size150″ vs 200″+33%
Specifications

Side by side

Yaber K2s ProYaber K2s Pro≈ US$3804.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,500 lm1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)400:115,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.5:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.65:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.32 m—
Smallest image size60″40″
Largest image size150″200″
Optical zoom1.1×—
Lens shiftNoneNone
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life20,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise32 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)30 dB—
Weight2.2 kg3.2 kg
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare