How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Photon Life PK32 vs NeoPix 750

Optoma Photon Life PK32 vs Philips NeoPix 750

What Photon Life PK32 does better (2) and where NeoPix 750 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Optoma Photon Life PK32
Optoma · 2025Photon Life PK32
5.3Score
2 advantages≈ US$690
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
1 advantage≈ US$610

Why is Photon Life PK32 better than NeoPix 750?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Largest image size150″ vs 120″+25%

Why is NeoPix 750 better than Photon Life PK32?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 14 W+40%
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLED—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,100 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)400:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.12:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.46:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.48 m—
Smallest image size60″—
Largest image size150″120″
Optical zoom1.1×—
Lens shiftNone—
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W14 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise32 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)30 dB—
Weight2.2 kg—
Width—305 mm
Height—119 mm
Depth—319 mm
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare