- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QT12 vs Photon Life PK32
Acer QT12 vs Optoma Photon Life PK32
What QT12 does better (1) and where Photon Life PK32 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
6.8Picture3.8
Why is QT12 better than Photon Life PK32?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)6,500 lm vs 1,100 lm5.9×
Why is Photon Life PK32 better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- Light source life6,500 h vs 30,000 h4.6×
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Audio outputNo · QT12: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 6,500 lm | 1,100 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 400:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.12:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.46:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.48 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 60″ |
| Largest image size | — | 150″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.1× |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 6,500 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 32 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 30 dB |
| Weight | — | 2.2 kg |
| Colours | White | Black |
