How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. UHD55 vs NeoPix Prime 2

Optoma UHD55 vs Philips NeoPix Prime 2

What UHD55 does better (6) and where NeoPix Prime 2 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Optoma UHD55
Optoma · 2022UHD55
7.2Score
6 advantages≈ US$1,850
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix Prime 2
Philips · 2021NeoPix Prime 2
0 advantages
8.4Picture2.2

Why is UHD55 better than NeoPix Prime 2?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,600 lm vs 180 lm20×
  2. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,200,000:1 vs 3,000:1400×
  4. Largest image size300″ vs 80″3.8×
  5. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
  6. Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix Prime 2: No

Why is NeoPix Prime 2 better than UHD55?

NeoPix Prime 2 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Optoma UHD55Optoma UHD55≈ US$1,8507.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1280 × 720 (HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 720 (HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technologyDLP—
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,600 lm180 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,200,000:13,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHLG—
3D playbackYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.21:11.3:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.59:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.68 m2.88 m
Largest image size300″80″
Lens shiftVertical—
Autofocus—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—Yes
Bluetooth—Yes
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
HDMI version2—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)YesNo
VGA inputYesYes
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption317 W—
Light source life4,000 h—
Light source life (eco mode)10,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise28 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)25 dB—
Weight—3 kg
ColoursWhiteSilver, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare