How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. PV800 Pro vs Cube2 Pro

OSCAL PV800 Pro vs Xiaomi Cube2 Pro

What PV800 Pro does better (2) and where Cube2 Pro wins (0) — every spec side by side.

OSCAL PV800 Pro
OSCAL · 2026PV800 Pro
2 advantages≈ US$210
vs
Xiaomi Cube2 Pro
Xiaomi · 2026Cube2 Pro
6.4Score
0 advantages≈ US$200
Higher score
4.9Smart features & sound3.8

Why is PV800 Pro better than Cube2 Pro?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)8 W vs 6 W+33%
  2. Largest image size200″ vs 120″+67%

Why is Cube2 Pro better than PV800 Pro?

Cube2 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

OSCAL PV800 ProOSCAL PV800 Pro≈ US$210
Xiaomi Cube2 ProXiaomi Cube2 Pro≈ US$2006.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—500 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)1,400 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)4,000:1—
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10+, HDR10—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.2:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—2.66 m
Smallest image size40″40″
Largest image size200″120″
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)8 W6 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TVAndroid (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-inYes—
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise35 dB—
Weight—0.9 kg
ColoursSilver, White, Grey—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare