- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- MC425 vs PV800 Pro
HP MC425 vs OSCAL PV800 Pro
What MC425 does better (0) and where PV800 Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is MC425 better than PV800 Pro?
MC425 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PV800 Pro better than MC425?
- Audio outputNo · MC425: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 1,400 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 4,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 40″ |
| Largest image size | — | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 8 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Google TV |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | 55 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 35 dB |
| Weight | 1 kg | — |
| Width | 120 mm | — |
| Height | 156 mm | — |
| Depth | 102 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Silver, White, Grey |
