How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. GamePix 800 vs PX700HDHE

Philips GamePix 800 vs ViewSonic PX700HDHE

What GamePix 800 does better (1) and where PX700HDHE wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips GamePix 800
Philips · 2025GamePix 800
3.7Score
1 advantage≈ US$790
vs
ViewSonic PX700HDHE
ViewSonic · 2025PX700HDHE
5.1Score
4 advantages≈ US$710
Higher score
3.5Picture4.2
2.5Setup & placement4.9

Why is GamePix 800 better than PX700HDHE?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 6,000 h5×

Why is PX700HDHE better than GamePix 800?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,500 lm vs 3,700 lm+48%
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 10 W2×
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:1 vs 22,000:114.7×
  4. Weight2.7 kg vs 2.4 kg+13%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips GamePix 800Philips GamePix 800≈ US$7903.7
ViewSonic PX700HDHEViewSonic PX700HDHE≈ US$7105.1
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLamp
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,500 lm3,700 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,500:122,000:1
HDR support—No
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.49:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)—1.64:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.3 m
Smallest image size—30″
Largest image size—300″
Optical zoom—2×
Lens shift—None
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W10 W
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
HDMI version—1.4
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—300 W
Light source life30,000 h6,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—31 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—27 dB
Weight2.7 kg2.4 kg
Width302 mm—
Height99 mm—
Depth170 mm—
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare