- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 122 vs NeoPix 140
Philips NeoPix 122 vs Philips NeoPix 140
What NeoPix 122 does better (4) and where NeoPix 140 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.2Picture2.4
Dimensions
Size comparison
NeoPix 122NeoPix 140
| NeoPix 122 | NeoPix 140 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 102 mm | 142 mm | −40 mm |
| Width | 225 mm | 68 mm | +157 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 74 mm | +116 mm |
| Weight | 0.8 kg | 0.3 kg | +0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NeoPix 122 better than NeoPix 140?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 3 W3.3×
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1024 × 768 (XGA)
Why is NeoPix 140 better than NeoPix 122?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm vs 150 lm+50%
- Weight0.85 kg vs 0.3 kg2.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 100 lm | 150 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.47:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.25 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 65″ | — |
| Largest image size | 65″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 42 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.85 kg | 0.3 kg |
| Width | 225 mm | 68 mm |
| Height | 102 mm | 142 mm |
| Depth | 190 mm | 74 mm |
| Colours | Black | — |
