- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 450 vs K2s
Philips NeoPix 450 vs Yaber K2s
What NeoPix 450 does better (2) and where K2s wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Picture3.1
9.7Setup & placement3.2
4.7Smart features & sound3.3
Why is NeoPix 450 better than K2s?
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · K2s: No
- Weight2.48 kg vs 3.2 kg+29%
Why is K2s better than NeoPix 450?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm vs 800 lm+60%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 15,000:115×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 500 lm | 800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 15,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2.48 kg | 3.2 kg |
| Width | 195 mm | — |
| Height | 219 mm | — |
| Depth | 194 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
