How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 450 vs K2s Pro

Philips NeoPix 450 vs Yaber K2s Pro

What NeoPix 450 does better (2) and where K2s Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 450
Philips · 2025NeoPix 450
5.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$320
Higher score
vs
Yaber K2s Pro
Yaber · 2025K2s Pro
4.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$380
2.5Picture3.3
9.7Setup & placement2.8
4.7Smart features & sound9.0

Why is NeoPix 450 better than K2s Pro?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionYes · K2s Pro: No
  2. Weight2.48 kg vs 3.2 kg+29%

Why is K2s Pro better than NeoPix 450?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm vs 1,000 lm2×
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 20 W2×
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 15,000:115×
  4. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 450Philips NeoPix 450≈ US$3205.4
Yaber K2s ProYaber K2s Pro≈ US$3804.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:115,000:1
Lens & placement
Smallest image size—40″
Largest image size—200″
Lens shift—None
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformGoogle TVAndroid (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)Yes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-inYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Design & noise
Weight2.48 kg3.2 kg
Width195 mm—
Height219 mm—
Depth194 mm—
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare