How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 520 vs NeoPix 530

Philips NeoPix 520 vs Philips NeoPix 530

What NeoPix 520 does better (1) and where NeoPix 530 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 520
Philips · 2022NeoPix 520
8.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$480
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 530
Philips · 2023NeoPix 530
8.5Score
0 advantages≈ US$250
2.2Setup & placement2.2
6.4Smart features & sound6.4
9.6Noise, lifetime & portability9.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix 520NeoPix 530
274 × 107294274 × 107294
NeoPix 520NeoPix 530Difference
Height107 mm107 mm=
Width274 mm274 mm=
Depth294 mm294 mm=
Weight2.4 kg2.7 kg−0.3 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix 520 better than NeoPix 530?

  1. Weight2.4 kg vs 2.7 kg+13%

Why is NeoPix 530 better than NeoPix 520?

NeoPix 530 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 520Philips NeoPix 520≈ US$4808.6
Philips NeoPix 530Philips NeoPix 530≈ US$2508.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.43:11.43:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.17 m3.17 m
Largest image size100″100″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)14 W14 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption100 W100 W
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight2.4 kg2.7 kg
Width274 mm274 mm
Height107 mm107 mm
Depth294 mm294 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare