How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 530 vs Miró

Philips NeoPix 530 vs Prixton Miró

What NeoPix 530 does better (2) and where Miró wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 530
Philips · 2023NeoPix 530
8.5Score
2 advantages≈ US$250
Higher score
vs
Prixton Miró
Prixton · 2023Miró
3.7Score
1 advantage≈ US$200
2.2Setup & placement2.6
6.4Smart features & sound3.3

Why is NeoPix 530 better than Miró?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)14 W vs 10 W+40%
  2. Audio outputYes · Miró: No

Why is Miró better than NeoPix 530?

  1. Largest image size100″ vs 210″2.1×
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 530Philips NeoPix 530≈ US$2508.5
Prixton MiróPrixton Miró≈ US$2003.7
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—800 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.43:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.17 m—
Smallest image size—30″
Largest image size100″210″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)14 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption100 W—
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Weight2.7 kg—
Width274 mm—
Height107 mm—
Depth294 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare