- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 530 vs K2s
Philips NeoPix 530 vs Yaber K2s
What NeoPix 530 does better (2) and where K2s wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.2Setup & placement3.2
6.4Smart features & sound3.3
Why is NeoPix 530 better than K2s?
- Built-in speakers (total output)14 W vs 10 W+40%
- Weight2.7 kg vs 3.2 kg+19%
Why is K2s better than NeoPix 530?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 15,000:15×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 15,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.43:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.17 m | — |
| Largest image size | 100″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 14 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 100 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 2.7 kg | 3.2 kg |
| Width | 274 mm | — |
| Height | 107 mm | — |
| Depth | 294 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
