- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Neopix 950 vs LSD400W
Philips Neopix 950 vs ViewSonic LSD400W
What Neopix 950 does better (3) and where LSD400W wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.1Picture6.8
9.0Setup & placement6.6
9.0Noise, lifetime & portability6.5
Why is Neopix 950 better than LSD400W?
- Automatic keystone correctionYes · LSD400W: No
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- Fan noise27 dB vs 30 dB+11%
Why is LSD400W better than Neopix 950?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)1,400 lm vs 4,000 lm2.9×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,100:1 vs 3,000,000:12,727.3×
- Largest image size150″ vs 300″2×
- Weight4.3 kg vs 3.1 kg+39%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | 3LCD | DLP |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,400 lm | 4,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,100:1 | 3,000,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 150″ | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Google TV | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Netflix (officially licensed) | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 27 dB | 30 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | 4.3 kg | 3.1 kg |
| Width | — | 286 mm |
| Height | — | 129 mm |
| Depth | — | 216 mm |
| Colours | Black | White |
