How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix 230 vs Neopix 950

Philips NeoPix 230 vs Philips Neopix 950

What NeoPix 230 does better (2) and where Neopix 950 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix 230
Philips · 2024NeoPix 230
4.5Score
2 advantages≈ US$350
vs
Philips Neopix 950
Philips · 2025Neopix 950
7.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$620
Higher score
2.4Picture3.1
8.6Setup & placement9.0
3.7Smart features & sound5.5

Why is NeoPix 230 better than Neopix 950?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 1,100:12.7×
  2. Weight2.5 kg vs 4.3 kg+72%

Why is Neopix 950 better than NeoPix 230?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 1,400 lm5.6×
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  3. Largest image size80″ vs 150″+88%
Specifications

Side by side

Philips NeoPix 230Philips NeoPix 230≈ US$3504.5
Philips Neopix 950Philips Neopix 950≈ US$6207.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—3LCD
Light source—LED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm1,400 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:11,100:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.66 m—
Smallest image size48″—
Largest image size80″150″
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Google TV
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)YesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—27 dB
Weight2.5 kg4.3 kg
Width239 mm—
Height187 mm—
Depth140 mm—
ColoursWhiteBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare