- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix Ace vs NeoPix Ultra One+
Philips NeoPix Ace vs Philips NeoPix Ultra One+
What NeoPix Ace does better (2) and where NeoPix Ultra One+ wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Setup & placement2.2
Why is NeoPix Ace better than NeoPix Ultra One+?
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Largest image size120″ vs 80″+50%
Why is NeoPix Ultra One+ better than NeoPix Ace?
- Audio outputNo · NeoPix Ace: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 4,200 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.4:1 | 1.4:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.1 m | 3.1 m |
| Smallest image size | 20″ | — |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 80″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 100 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 1.2 kg |
| Width | — | 220 mm |
| Height | — | 90 mm |
| Depth | — | 170 mm |
| Colours | Silver, Black | Silver, Black |
