- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix Ace vs M1 Mini
Philips NeoPix Ace vs ViewSonic M1 Mini
What NeoPix Ace does better (4) and where M1 Mini wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.8Setup & placement3.3
Why is NeoPix Ace better than M1 Mini?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Largest image size120″ vs 100″+20%
Why is M1 Mini better than NeoPix Ace?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 5,000:1+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 50 lm |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 4,200 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 5,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.4:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.1 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | 20″ | 24″ |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 100″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 25 dB |
| Weight | — | 0.3 kg |
| Width | — | 110 mm |
| Height | — | 27 mm |
| Depth | — | 104 mm |
| Colours | Silver, Black | White, Blue |
