How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix Ace vs Halo

Philips NeoPix Ace vs XGIMI Halo

What NeoPix Ace does better (1) and where Halo wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix Ace
Philips · 2020NeoPix Ace
1 advantage≈ US$280
vs
XGIMI Halo
XGIMI · 2021Halo
7.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$370
Higher score
2.8Setup & placement8.2

Why is NeoPix Ace better than Halo?

  1. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is Halo better than NeoPix Ace?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · NeoPix Ace: Yes
  2. Audio outputNo · NeoPix Ace: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

XGIMI HaloXGIMI Halo≈ US$3707.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K input only (downscaled)
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—700 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)4,200 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1—
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10+
3D playback—Yes
Gaming
Game / low-latency mode—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.2:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m2.66 m
Smallest image size20″—
Largest image size120″—
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Internal storage—16 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in battery—Yes
Power consumption—90 W
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise—30 dB
Weight—1.6 kg
Width—145 mm
Height—114 mm
Depth—172 mm
ColoursSilver, BlackBlack, Silver
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare