How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix Ace vs U12

Philips NeoPix Ace vs Yaber U12

What NeoPix Ace does better (1) and where U12 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix Ace
Philips · 2020NeoPix Ace
1 advantage≈ US$280
vs
Yaber U12
Yaber · 2024U12
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$280
Higher score
2.8Setup & placement7.4

Why is NeoPix Ace better than U12?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%

Why is U12 better than NeoPix Ace?

  1. AutofocusNo · NeoPix Ace: Yes
  2. Largest image size120″ vs 300″2.5×
  3. Ethernet (LAN)No · NeoPix Ace: Yes
  4. Audio outputNo · NeoPix Ace: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Yaber U12Yaber U12≈ US$2809.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—700 lm
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)4,200 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.36:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m3.01 m
Smallest image size20″—
Largest image size120″300″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Own / Linux platform
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputNoYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
ColoursSilver, BlackGrey, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare