- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix Ultra 2TV+ vs Horizon Pro
Philips NeoPix Ultra 2TV+ vs XGIMI Horizon Pro
What NeoPix Ultra 2TV+ does better (3) and where Horizon Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.6Picture4.5
2.0Setup & placement8.8
9.0Smart features & sound6.7
8.9Noise, lifetime & portability8.7
Dimensions
Size comparison
NeoPix Ultra 2TV+Horizon Pro
| NeoPix Ultra 2TV+ | Horizon Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 120 mm | 136 mm | −16 mm |
| Width | 315 mm | 208 mm | +107 mm |
| Depth | 235 mm | 218 mm | +17 mm |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.9 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NeoPix Ultra 2TV+ better than Horizon Pro?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,200 lm vs 1,500 lm2.8×
- Built-in speakers (total output)20 W vs 16 W+25%
- Weight2.4 kg vs 2.9 kg+21%
Why is Horizon Pro better than NeoPix Ultra 2TV+?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
- AutofocusNo · NeoPix Ultra 2TV+: Yes
- Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1 vs 10,000:13.3×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · NeoPix Ultra 2TV+: Yes
- Largest image size120″ vs 200″+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,200 lm | 1,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | 10,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.31:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.9 m | 2.66 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 40″ |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Obstacle avoidance | — | Yes |
| Automatic screen fit | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 20 W | 16 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | Android TV |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| AirPlay | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 32 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI eARC | — | Yes |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 100 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 30 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 30 dB |
| Weight | 2.4 kg | 2.9 kg |
| Width | 315 mm | 208 mm |
| Height | 120 mm | 136 mm |
| Depth | 235 mm | 218 mm |
| Colours | Silver, Black | Black |
Related comparisons
vs
ViewSonic PX701-4KvsPhilips NeoPix Ultra 2TV+
7.37.4
vs
JVC DLA-NZ8vsPhilips NeoPix Ultra 2TV+
7.57.4
vs
Optoma GT1080HDRvsPhilips NeoPix Ultra 2TV+
vs
Wimius 7500 LvsPhilips NeoPix Ultra 2TV+
vs
LG CineBeam AU810P ForzavsPhilips NeoPix Ultra 2TV+
7.37.4
vs
Optoma UHD30vsPhilips NeoPix Ultra 2TV+
7.37.4