How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix Ultra One+ vs X2 Max

Philips NeoPix Ultra One+ vs Wanbo X2 Max

What NeoPix Ultra One+ does better (1) and where X2 Max wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix Ultra One+
Philips · 2022NeoPix Ultra One+
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$290
vs
Wanbo X2 Max
Wanbo · 2024X2 Max
5.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$300
Higher score
7.8Smart features & sound7.8
5.3Noise, lifetime & portability2.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

NeoPix Ultra One+X2 Max
220 × 90170225 × 94178
NeoPix Ultra One+X2 MaxDifference
Height90 mm94 mm−4 mm
Width220 mm225 mm−5 mm
Depth170 mm178 mm−8 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is NeoPix Ultra One+ better than X2 Max?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%

Why is X2 Max better than NeoPix Ultra One+?

  1. AutofocusNo · NeoPix Ultra One+: Yes
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  3. Largest image size80″ vs 120″+50%
Specifications

Side by side

Wanbo X2 MaxWanbo X2 Max≈ US$3005.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—450 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m—
Largest image size80″120″
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
HDMI version—2.1
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption100 W—
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—35 dB
Weight1.2 kg—
Width220 mm225 mm
Height90 mm94 mm
Depth170 mm178 mm
ColoursSilver, Black—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare