How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. NeoPix Ultra One+ vs U12

Philips NeoPix Ultra One+ vs Yaber U12

What NeoPix Ultra One+ does better (1) and where U12 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Philips NeoPix Ultra One+
Philips · 2022NeoPix Ultra One+
5.3Score
1 advantage≈ US$290
vs
Yaber U12
Yaber · 2024U12
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ US$280
Higher score
2.2Setup & placement7.4
7.8Smart features & sound9.4

Why is NeoPix Ultra One+ better than U12?

  1. Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%

Why is U12 better than NeoPix Ultra One+?

  1. AutofocusNo · NeoPix Ultra One+: Yes
  2. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 20 W2×
  3. Largest image size80″ vs 300″3.8×
  4. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  5. Ethernet (LAN)No · NeoPix Ultra One+: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Yaber U12Yaber U12≈ US$2809.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)—700 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,000:1—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.4:11.36:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.1 m3.01 m
Largest image size80″300″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoYes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Own / Linux platform
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputYesNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption100 W—
Light source life30,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Weight1.2 kg—
Width220 mm—
Height90 mm—
Depth170 mm—
ColoursSilver, BlackGrey, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare