- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix Ultra One vs T2 Ultra
Philips NeoPix Ultra One vs Wanbo T2 Ultra
What NeoPix Ultra One does better (3) and where T2 Ultra wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.1Setup & placement2.7
Why is NeoPix Ultra One better than T2 Ultra?
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Audio outputYes · T2 Ultra: No
Why is T2 Ultra better than NeoPix Ultra One?
- Largest image size65″ vs 150″2.3×
- Wi-FiNo · NeoPix Ultra One: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 3,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.4:1 | 1.35:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.1 m | 2.99 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 45″ |
| Largest image size | 65″ | 150″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 100 W | — |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1.2 kg | 1.2 kg |
| Width | 220 mm | — |
| Height | 90 mm | — |
| Depth | 170 mm | — |
| Colours | Silver, Black | White |
