- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- VPL-XW6100ES vs VPL-XW7000ES
Sony VPL-XW6100ES vs Sony VPL-XW7000ES
What VPL-XW6100ES does better (1) and where VPL-XW7000ES wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.3Picture7.8
5.6Noise, lifetime & portability5.2
Dimensions
Size comparison
VPL-XW6100ESVPL-XW7000ES
| VPL-XW6100ES | VPL-XW7000ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 210 mm | 210 mm | = |
| Width | 460 mm | 460 mm | = |
| Depth | 517 mm | 517 mm | = |
| Weight | 14 kg | 14 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VPL-XW6100ES better than VPL-XW7000ES?
- Power consumption380 W vs 420 W+11%
Why is VPL-XW7000ES better than VPL-XW6100ES?
- Lens shiftVertical vs Vertical and horizontal
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,700 lm vs 3,200 lm+19%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | Native 4K |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,700 lm | 3,200 lm |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | 1.35:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 2.84:1 | 2.84:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | 2.99 m |
| Optical zoom | — | 2.1× |
| Lens shift | Vertical | Vertical and horizontal |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI version | 2.1 | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 380 W | 420 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 26 dB | 26 dB |
| Weight | 14 kg | 14 kg |
| Width | 460 mm | 460 mm |
| Height | 210 mm | 210 mm |
| Depth | 517 mm | 517 mm |
