- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- VPL-XW7000ES vs Halo+ GTV
Sony VPL-XW7000ES vs XGIMI Halo+ GTV
What VPL-XW7000ES does better (5) and where Halo+ GTV wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
7.8Picture2.7
Why is VPL-XW7000ES better than Halo+ GTV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,200 lm vs 900 lm3.6×
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · Halo+ GTV: No
Why is Halo+ GTV better than VPL-XW7000ES?
- Weight14 kg vs 1.6 kg8.8×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | Native 4K | — |
| Display technology | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,200 lm | 900 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 200:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | Yes | — |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.35:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 2.84:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.99 m | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | — | 120″ |
| Optical zoom | 2.1× | — |
| Lens shift | Vertical and horizontal | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 420 W | — |
| Light source life | — | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 26 dB | — |
| Weight | 14 kg | 1.6 kg |
| Width | 460 mm | — |
| Height | 210 mm | — |
| Depth | 517 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Grey |
