- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Q1 vs TX-332
Strong Q1 vs Technaxx TX-332
What Q1 does better (0) and where TX-332 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
Why is Q1 better than TX-332?
Q1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is TX-332 better than Q1?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)180 lm vs 200 lm+11%
- Wi-FiNo · Q1: Yes
- Audio outputNo · Q1: Yes
- Largest image size120″ vs 150″+25%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 180 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 1,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 27″ |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 150″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| AirPlay | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | No | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.8 kg | 0.8 kg |
| Width | 97 mm | — |
| Height | 150 mm | — |
| Depth | 140 mm | — |
| Colours | Grey | White |
