- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- NeoPix 140 vs Q1
Philips NeoPix 140 vs Strong Q1
What NeoPix 140 does better (3) and where Q1 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Picture3.8
Dimensions
Size comparison
NeoPix 140Q1
| NeoPix 140 | Q1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 142 mm | 150 mm | −8 mm |
| Width | 68 mm | 97 mm | −29 mm |
| Depth | 74 mm | 140 mm | −66 mm |
| Weight | 0.3 kg | 0.8 kg | −0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is NeoPix 140 better than Q1?
- Weight0.3 kg vs 0.8 kg2.7×
- Wi-FiYes · Q1: No
- Audio outputYes · Q1: No
Why is Q1 better than NeoPix 140?
- Resolution (on screen)1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 180 lm+20%
- Native panel resolution1024 × 768 (XGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Largest image size65″ vs 120″+85%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1024 × 768 (XGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1024 × 768 (XGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 180 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 65″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | No |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.3 kg | 0.8 kg |
| Width | 68 mm | 97 mm |
| Height | 142 mm | 150 mm |
| Depth | 74 mm | 140 mm |
| Colours | — | Grey |
