- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TX-127 vs TX-177
Technaxx TX-127 vs Technaxx TX-177
What TX-127 does better (2) and where TX-177 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TX-127TX-177
| TX-127 | TX-177 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 75 mm | 96 mm | −21 mm |
| Width | 145 mm | 187 mm | −42 mm |
| Depth | 210 mm | 234 mm | −24 mm |
| Weight | 1.2 kg | 1.4 kg | −0.2 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TX-127 better than TX-177?
- Power consumption56 W vs 70 W+25%
- Weight1.2 kg vs 1.36 kg+13%
Why is TX-177 better than TX-127?
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 1,500:1+50%
- Largest image size150″ vs 200″+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | 2,000 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 27″ | 50″ |
| Largest image size | 150″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | 3 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 56 W | 70 W |
| Light source life | 40,000 h | 40,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 51 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.2 kg | 1.36 kg |
| Width | 145 mm | 187 mm |
| Height | 75 mm | 96 mm |
| Depth | 210 mm | 234 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
