- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TX-332 vs L1
Technaxx TX-332 vs Yaber L1
What TX-332 does better (5) and where L1 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is TX-332 better than L1?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Audio outputYes · L1: No
- Weight0.8 kg vs 0.96 kg+20%
Why is L1 better than TX-332?
L1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 27″ | — |
| Largest image size | 150″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 65 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.8 kg | 0.96 kg |
| Width | — | 160 mm |
| Height | — | 118 mm |
| Depth | — | 125 mm |
| Colours | White | White, Black |
