≈ US$410
- Light source life 20,000 h vs 30,000 h
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
Alternatives to Philips NeoPix Ultra 2+
10 portable & mini projectors at a similar price that compete with the NeoPix Ultra 2+ — what each does better, what it gives up and how the price compares.
Alternatives to the NeoPix Ultra 2+
≈ US$290
- Largest image size 80″ vs 65″
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
≈ US$190
- Power consumption 42 W vs 100 W
- Weight 0.85 kg vs 1.2 kg
- Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
≈ US$630
- Autofocus
- Largest image size 120″ vs 65″
- Power consumption 90 W vs 100 W
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Weight 1.57 kg vs 1.2 kg
5
TopVision · 2022TYY0013-DE
- Light source life 90,000 h vs 30,000 h
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) 9,000:1 vs 3,000:1
- Largest image size 300″ vs 65″
- Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 800 (WXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution 1280 × 800 (WXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
≈ US$360
- Autofocus
- Automatic keystone correction
- Power consumption 50 W vs 100 W
- Built-in speakers (total output) 5 W vs 10 W
- Light source life 20,000 h vs 30,000 h
≈ US$640
- Largest image size 120″ vs 65″
- Weight 0.95 kg vs 1.2 kg
- Built-in speakers (total output) 8 W vs 10 W
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
≈ US$460
- Autofocus
- Automatic keystone correction
- Built-in speakers (total output) 16 W vs 10 W
- Resolution (on screen) 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution 1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
≈ US$470
- Autofocus
- Automatic keystone correction
- Largest image size 200″ vs 65″
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2
- Light source life 25,000 h vs 30,000 h
≈ US$240
- Autofocus
- Ethernet (LAN)
- Largest image size 120″ vs 65″
- HDMI inputs 1 vs 2