- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- C200 vs NeoPix 113
Acer C200 vs Philips NeoPix 113
What C200 does better (1) and where NeoPix 113 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is C200 better than NeoPix 113?
- Weight0.35 kg vs 0.4 kg+14%
Why is NeoPix 113 better than C200?
NeoPix 113 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.15:1 | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.55 m | 3.25 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 65″ |
| Largest image size | — | 65″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 29 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.35 kg | 0.4 kg |
| Width | 110 mm | — |
| Height | 30 mm | — |
| Depth | 120 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
