- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- C250i vs NeoPix Easy 2+
Acer C250i vs Philips NeoPix Easy 2+
What C250i does better (1) and where NeoPix Easy 2+ wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is C250i better than NeoPix Easy 2+?
- Weight0.78 kg vs 0.86 kg+10%
Why is NeoPix Easy 2+ better than C250i?
NeoPix Easy 2+ has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 300 lm | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.21:1 | 1.4:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.68 m | 3.1 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 24″ |
| Largest image size | — | 60″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | Yes |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | — | 42 W |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 28 dB | — |
| Weight | 0.78 kg | 0.86 kg |
| Width | — | 207 mm |
| Height | — | 84 mm |
| Depth | — | 150 mm |
| Colours | — | Silver, Black |
