- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- M511 vs TH575C
Acer M511 vs BenQ TH575C
What M511 does better (2) and where TH575C wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
M511TH575C
| M511 | TH575C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 114 mm | 120 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 313 mm | 296 mm | +17 mm |
| Depth | 240 mm | 237 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is M511 better than TH575C?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,300 lm vs 3,800 lm+13%
- Fan noise27 dB vs 34 dB+26%
Why is TH575C better than M511?
- Weight3 kg vs 2.3 kg+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) | — |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,300 lm | 3,800 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 10,000:1 | — |
| 3D playback | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.49:1 | 1.49:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.67:1 | 1.64:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.3 m | 3.3 m |
| Largest image size | 301″ | — |
| Optical zoom | 1.12× | 1.1× |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | — |
| VGA input | Yes | — |
| Audio output | Yes | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 295 W | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 27 dB | 34 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 24 dB | — |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Width | 313 mm | 296 mm |
| Height | 114 mm | 120 mm |
| Depth | 240 mm | 237 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
