- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF16ATV vs Xiaoxin 100P
Acer QF16ATV vs Lenovo Xiaoxin 100P
What QF16ATV does better (0) and where Xiaoxin 100P wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is QF16ATV better than Xiaoxin 100P?
QF16ATV has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Xiaoxin 100P better than QF16ATV?
Xiaoxin 100P has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 550 lm | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 72″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android (not TV-certified) | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 16 dB | — |
| Weight | 3.15 kg | — |
| Width | 178 mm | — |
| Height | 257 mm | — |
| Depth | 192 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | White |
