How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. QF16ATV vs MultiVision PRO

Acer QF16ATV vs Manta MultiVision PRO

What QF16ATV does better (1) and where MultiVision PRO wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acer QF16ATV
Acer · 2025QF16ATV
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$320
vs
Manta MultiVision PRO
Manta · 2026MultiVision PRO
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$270
Higher score
2.7Picture2.9

Why is QF16ATV better than MultiVision PRO?

  1. Weight3.15 kg vs 3.5 kg+11%

Why is MultiVision PRO better than QF16ATV?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)550 lm vs 800 lm+45%
  2. Light source life30,000 h vs 50,000 h+67%
Specifications

Side by side

Acer QF16ATVAcer QF16ATV≈ US$3203.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)550 lm800 lm
Lens & placement
Smallest image size72″—
Largest image size300″—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—200 W
Light source life30,000 h50,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise—34 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)16 dB—
Weight3.15 kg3.5 kg
Width178 mm—
Height257 mm108 mm
Depth192 mm239 mm
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare