How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. QF16ATV vs NeoPix 450

Acer QF16ATV vs Philips NeoPix 450

What QF16ATV does better (1) and where NeoPix 450 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acer QF16ATV
Acer · 2025QF16ATV
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$320
vs
Philips NeoPix 450
Philips · 2025NeoPix 450
5.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$320
Higher score
2.7Picture2.5
6.5Setup & placement9.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

QF16ATVNeoPix 450
178 × 257192195 × 219194
QF16ATVNeoPix 450Difference
Height257 mm219 mm+38 mm
Width178 mm195 mm−17 mm
Depth192 mm194 mm−2 mm
Weight3.2 kg2.5 kg+0.7 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is QF16ATV better than NeoPix 450?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)550 lm vs 500 lm+10%

Why is NeoPix 450 better than QF16ATV?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · QF16ATV: Yes
  2. Weight3.15 kg vs 2.48 kg+27%
Specifications

Side by side

Acer QF16ATVAcer QF16ATV≈ US$3203.8
Philips NeoPix 450Philips NeoPix 450≈ US$3205.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)—
Light sourceLED—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)550 lm500 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,000:1
Lens & placement
Smallest image size72″—
Largest image size300″—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusYesYes
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Google TV
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Chromecast built-in—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs—1
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise (eco mode)16 dB—
Weight3.15 kg2.48 kg
Width178 mm195 mm
Height257 mm219 mm
Depth192 mm194 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare