How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. QF16ATV vs K2s

Acer QF16ATV vs Yaber K2s

What QF16ATV does better (0) and where K2s wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acer QF16ATV
Acer · 2025QF16ATV
3.8Score
0 advantages≈ US$320
vs
Yaber K2s
Yaber · 2023K2s
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$320
Higher score
2.7Picture3.1
6.5Setup & placement3.2

Why is QF16ATV better than K2s?

QF16ATV has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is K2s better than QF16ATV?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)550 lm vs 800 lm+45%
Specifications

Side by side

Acer QF16ATVAcer QF16ATV≈ US$3203.8
Yaber K2sYaber K2s≈ US$3203.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)550 lm800 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—15,000:1
Lens & placement
Smallest image size72″—
Largest image size300″—
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)—
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs—2
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise (eco mode)16 dB—
Weight3.15 kg3.2 kg
Width178 mm—
Height257 mm—
Depth192 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare