How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. QF16ATV vs K2s Pro

Acer QF16ATV vs Yaber K2s Pro

What QF16ATV does better (1) and where K2s Pro wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acer QF16ATV
Acer · 2025QF16ATV
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$320
vs
Yaber K2s Pro
Yaber · 2025K2s Pro
4.4Score
1 advantage≈ US$380
Higher score
2.7Picture3.3
6.5Setup & placement2.8

Why is QF16ATV better than K2s Pro?

  1. Largest image size300″ vs 200″+50%

Why is K2s Pro better than QF16ATV?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)550 lm vs 1,000 lm+82%
Specifications

Side by side

Acer QF16ATVAcer QF16ATV≈ US$3203.8
Yaber K2s ProYaber K2s Pro≈ US$3804.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyLCD (single panel)LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)550 lm1,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—15,000:1
Lens & placement
Smallest image size72″40″
Largest image size300″200″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—20 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid (not TV-certified)Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs—2
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise (eco mode)16 dB—
Weight3.15 kg3.2 kg
Width178 mm—
Height257 mm—
Depth192 mm—
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare