- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF81 vs Luma 400 tragbarer HD
Acer QF81 vs Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
What QF81 does better (3) and where Luma 400 tragbarer HD wins (2) — every spec side by side.
9.3Picture3.0
Why is QF81 better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)800 lm vs 200 lm4×
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than QF81?
- Light source life800 h vs 3,500 h4.4×
- HDMI inputs0 vs 1
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 800 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,500:1 |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 0 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 800 h | 3,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | White | Black, White |
